Oliver Stone helped move the Overton Window on the Kennedy assassination. His film JFK, drawing from Jim Marrs’s book, paints a picture of what could have happened that day. At first it wasn’t common to question the narrative; the official story was generally accepted. But many began to question the details surrounding the President’s death, and now it’s fairly common to say the official story doesn’t tell the whole story. According to this poll, a majority believe the government was involved.
The same needs to happen for the Moon Landing. Doubting the moon landing needs to become acceptable, common, a must for every critical thinker. My aim here is not to thoroughly examine all the evidence for the moon hoax. For a meticulous debunk go here or here. I aim to provide inspiration for further investigation, and appeal to all critical thinkers to reconsider the moon landings.
A brief sampling of evidence fits into three basic categories: 1) Logistics 2) Optics and 3) Relics.
Apart from all the anomalies in evidence, the moon itself debunks the landing. With a powerful zoom lens, we see that the moon isn’t a spherical rock like we supposed. While in gibbous phase, pictures show the top edge of it has depth. It appears to change shape like a deflating bag, and behaves more like a
The moon isn’t 237,000 miles away like they said, it’s much closer, as you can tell in the photo. But it isn’t a spherical rock. There’s no way anyone landed on it. For years many have documented the inconsistencies in the moon landing story, but now we have evidence from the moon itself: it’s a light, not a rock.
For people who like videos:
This video contains a clip of Kubrick confessing his involvement.
This chronicles the behavior of astronauts questioned about their role in the hoaxes.
Please see this breakdown of moon hoax basics.
Here astronaut Don Pettit claims we destroyed the technology to go to the moon.
How do we shift the Overton Window on the moon hoax? How does it become commonplace to question it? We’re on twitter daily mocking the Lunar Lander. We ask people if they believe we went to the moon as a starting point, to see how much they’ve looked into things. But how do we keep pushing, til skepticism becomes the standard? Leave your answer in the comments.